Skip to content

Checklists

Trust Seat Selection Steps: Twelve Steps from Objectives to Legal Opinions

Trust seat selection steps work best in a fixed order: objectives first, then the legal system, then a shortlist, then written opinions. Here is the sequence, with a checklist you can tick off.

Updated · General information, not legal or tax advice for a particular situation.

Request a confidential assessment

On this page
  1. Why the order of the steps matters
  2. The sequence at a glance
  3. The twelve steps
  4. The checklist
  5. Where Switzerland fits in this process
  6. An illustration
  7. Frequently asked questions

Trust seat selection steps are easier to follow when you take them in the right order. Many settlors start with a name, such as Jersey, Singapore or Geneva, and only then ask what they need. The result is a seat that looks attractive on paper but fits neither the family nor the assets. This checklist reverses the sequence: you define what the trust must achieve, test each candidate against it, and ask for written legal opinions only once the shortlist is short.

The steps below are general information, not advice. Residence, the countries of your beneficiaries, the nature of the assets and the canton all change the answer, so each step ends in an individual analysis.

Why the order of the steps matters

A seat is a bundle of choices: the law that governs the trust, the place where it is administered, the regulator that supervises the trustee, and the courts that will hear a dispute. These can be separated, as explained in governing law versus seat of administration. If you pick the seat before you know your constraints, you tend to discover them later, when changing course is expensive.

Working in order also keeps the conversation with counsel productive. Each step produces a short written output that the next step uses.

The sequence at a glance

From objectives to legal opinions1ObjectivesWhat the trust must achieve and for whom2ConstraintsResidence, nationality, assets, beneficiaries3VehicleTrust, foundation or company4Legal criteriaRecognition, duration, protection, reporting5Practical criteriaBanking, trustee market, substance, stability6Longlist and shortlistScore candidates, drop the weak ones7Stress testsTest the shortlist against realistic scenarios8Legal opinionsWritten advice from counsel in each system
From objectives to legal opinions

The twelve steps

1. Write down the objectives

State in plain words what the trust is for: continuity of a business, support for a blended family, philanthropy, or holding assets across borders. A seat that suits one aim can be poor for another.

2. Map the people

List the settlor, likely beneficiaries, any protector and where each one lives and holds citizenship. A settlor with a US connection faces different limits, as shown in US person settlor and seat choice.

3. Map the assets

Note what will be settled: shares in an operating company, real estate, portfolios, digital assets. Where assets sit, their situs, can override the seat on some points, which real estate in trusts by seat explains.

4. Choose the vehicle first

Check whether a trust is the right tool at all, or whether a foundation or company serves better. Trust, foundation or company sets out that choice before any seat is considered.

5. Test recognition

Confirm that the families' home countries and the asset countries will recognise the trust. Treaty participation under the Hague Trusts Convention helps, but domestic rules still differ.

6. Check protection against claims

Look at how each candidate treats forced heirship, creditors and foreign judgments. Remember that protection always has limits and depends on facts.

7. Check duration and flexibility

Compare perpetuity limits, rules on reserved powers, and tools such as decanting or flee clauses. Your intended lifespan for the trust should fit the law you choose.

8. Check reporting and privacy

Compare what registers and automatic exchange regimes disclose, and to whom. Trust registers and privacy shows how much this varies.

9. Check banking and trustee market

A seat with elegant legislation but few capable trustees or hesitant banks is hard to use. Consider custody, account opening and the depth of local professionals.

10. Weigh stability and substance

Assess political and banking stability, sanctions exposure and any substance expectations. Treat these as qualitative judgments and revisit them over time.

11. Build the shortlist

Score the candidates against your own priorities, not a generic ranking. Drop any seat that fails a must-have, and keep a small number for comparison, for example through Switzerland versus Jersey or Switzerland versus Singapore.

12. Obtain written legal opinions

Ask qualified counsel in each shortlisted system for a written opinion on your facts: validity, recognition, tax interaction and enforcement. The final choice follows the opinions, not the other way around.

The checklist

  • Objectives written down in a short memo
  • Settlor, beneficiaries and protector mapped by residence and citizenship
  • Assets listed with their location and type
  • Vehicle chosen: trust, foundation or company
  • Recognition tested in every relevant country
  • Protection against claims reviewed, with limits noted
  • Duration and reserved-power rules compared
  • Register, privacy and reporting exposure compared
  • Banking and trustee market assessed
  • Stability, sanctions and substance considered
  • Shortlist scored against your own priorities
  • Legal opinions requested for each remaining seat

Where Switzerland fits in this process

Switzerland has no domestic trust law of its own. It recognises foreign-law trusts under the Hague Trusts Convention, and since the financial services legislation took effect, professional trustees active in Switzerland are supervised. Under the LEFin (FinIA), a trustee is anyone who, on a professional basis, manages a separate estate or disposes of it for a beneficiary or a defined purpose under a trust deed within the meaning of the 1985 Hague Convention. Activity is professional when it is an independent economic activity carried out to earn a regular income.

For a trustee based in Switzerland, the law requires registration in the commercial register, a management of at least two qualified persons, and a minimum capital of CHF 100,000 paid in cash, with suitable security or professional liability insurance. Trustees are supervised by FINMA, with day-to-day oversight by an authorized supervisory organization. These points matter at step nine and step ten, because they shape what you can expect from a Swiss counterparty. For the wider picture, read Switzerland as a trust seat.

An illustration

Example: a family established in Lausanne holds a family company and a holiday property abroad. Their first instinct is an offshore island seat. Working through the steps, they find that their heirs live in two countries, one of which restricts trust recognition, and that their bank prefers a regulated trustee. The shortlist shrinks to two seats, and the legal opinions decide between them. The outcome is specific to that family, which is exactly why the steps come before the name.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a trust seat and its governing law?

The governing law decides which legal system's rules apply to the trust itself. The seat is where the trust is mainly administered and supervised. They can be the same place or different places, and the difference affects regulation and disputes.

Can I change the seat after the trust is created?

Often yes, if the trust deed and the relevant laws allow it, but the process is technical and can have legal and tax effects. See moving a trust between jurisdictions for the mechanics.

How many seats should be on the shortlist?

Enough to compare meaningfully, but few enough that each can receive a proper legal opinion. Opinions are the costly part of the process, so a short list saves effort.

Do I need a legal opinion for every seat I consider?

Only for the shortlisted seats. Early screening can rely on public sources and general comparison. Opinions on your own facts come at the end.

Is a regulated seat always better?

Not necessarily. A regulated seat offers supervision and reputational comfort, while a lightly regulated seat may offer flexibility. Which suits you depends on your objectives and banking needs, as discussed in regulated versus lightly regulated seats.

Where do the fees for this work appear?

Fees depend on the structure and on the number of systems involved. They are indicated after the confidential assessment, not before.

Sources

Considering a trust, or reviewing one?

Describe your situation in a few lines. A Geneva-based trustee reviews it in confidence and replies in writing.

Request a confidential assessment